These presentations describe the amazing spectacles of wide-area missile and rocket events [launches, on-orbit plumes, reentries] seen around the world since the earliest years of the Space Age, usually by accident by startled and often frightened witnesses, but recently more and more often by intentional amateur observers with sophisticated equipment.
Close-up views from the space launch sites like Cape Canaveral and Baykonur have long been tourist attractions but these more distant wide-area sightings – usually at dawn and dusk twilight – have rarely been recognized for any connection to human spaceflight. Often they are interpreted and reported as mysterious anomalies such as UFOs, wormholes to alien worlds, divine or demonic visions, secret and malign atmospheric experiments in weather control, secret weapons, among other imaginary mythological manifestations.
These
reports are intended to first of all identify some of the most famous of the
modern myths of “unexplainable phenomena”, and also to describe the antidote
capabilities of the internet to investigate the nature of future apparitions of
this type.
On-line resources allow determination of illumination conditions, of positions
of satellites, of cloud cover, of background starfields for a given locale and
time, as well as recognition of unknown starfield backgrounds in images, of
maps of almost every street on most of
the planet along with street-view imagery of many of them that often allows taking
dashcam videos and then matching structures to provide precise determination of
location and orientation of posted imagery, of searches for earlier appearances
of given imagery, along with reasonably good foreign language translation.
In addition, ‘rocket science’ allows extraction of significant information from
an image that at first looks like little more than an amorphous blob – the
ascent path is often characterized by a swelling of the plume at about 80-100
km altitude, the altitude of Earth’s shadow can be found with trigonometry and
so changes in illumination can be translated into vehicle trajectory, and
in-space rocket plumes can serve as meter sticks since the raw velocity of the
plume growth is a function of a small range of rocket engine efficiencies [V =
Isp x g].
Clearly
these reports are of primary interest to spaceflight professionals and
enthusiasts, but the intended audience is much wider. Military historians will
find much of interest regarding highly classified missile and space projects of
the past that ‘leaked’ as ‘UFOs’. UFO investigators will find a great deal of
sobering insights into calibration of the highly variable level of accuracy of
witness reports of similar apparitions. Professional journalists will see
lessons on how to, and how NOT to, report such claims accurately and honestly. Educators
will discover the shocking level of widespread public misinformation and
misconceptions of fundamental features of missile and space flight, even after
two thirds of a century of the ‘Space Age’, that calls for [and justifies
spending for] more energetic outreach programs. Spaceflight enthusiasts will
recognize the daunting cultural challenge of familiarizing more people around
the world with the genuine visual features of human space flight.
The reports
also intend to convey the pure joy of original research into popular
‘mysteries’, the thrill of the hunt, the delicious satisfaction of finding and
assessing clues, the graphic illustration of the practical benefit of ‘rocket
science’ to everyday life, and the
satisfaction of providing so many baffled and anxious experiencers with a
plausible explanation of why they WEREN’T crazy when they saw their sky
spectacles.
These
research results are dedicated to the legions of unsung and often anonymous worldwide
chroniclers of such apparitions, mostly as ‘UFO reports’, and other anomalous
observations which so often fall through the cracks of scientific attention.
These people, numbering in the thousands, have labored tirelessly for decades
to capture information they want not to be lost forever, in the hopes that
someday it could be important in making sense of it. Without them, most of it
WOULD have vanished from human consciousness. Perhaps the prosaic explanations
offered here are not precisely in line with their own expectations of
extraordinary stimuli, but they are sincerely offered in fulfilment of their
higher hopes that someday somebody would take real lessons from their efforts,
and in keeping faith with them, would show their labors were not in vain.
These
reports are also mostly in ‘final draft’ form with additional evidence and
exposition yet to be added, often based on critical review comments and suggestions
from readers. Perhaps a centralized discussion forum on this topic could be
sponsored to gather similar work already done by many writers on such
sightings.
An excellent idea to bring all these reports together in one place so researchers can more easily search and analyze them. Thanks for posting this.
ReplyDeleteYour reporting on space events has always been at the top. Red Star in Orbit should be required reading for any burgeoning space historian. I know it certainly inspired me to go on with my research, interviews, and eventual book on the X-15 rocket plane. And your work since then has been just as amazing. Ferreting out what you have been able to do, from Russia to North Korea, is always fascinating, insightful, and right on. Thank you for your continued excellence in space reporting.
An interesting and much needed study to collect and explain the wide variety of rocket plumbs now becoming visible to a world audience. With so many new players in the satellite and rocket launching business, presumably new rocket designs and types being used/tested leading into the future, different launch residue features seem to be occurring that need logging and explained by those familiar with this field, and Jim Oberg is the right person for this job based upon his vast experience.
ReplyDeleteThis Blog will be a good ‘go to’ reference page to send those who enquire or show interest in this subject, especially those confusing these rocket launching with UFO sightings. It is important to have available these reference sites where such persons can be directed to, and learn what is REALLY going on in the skies above. I am sure Jim would also be open to critical thinking if something unexplainable as rocket launch effects, may need to be looked at as ‘possible UFO’ events. I know that I will be interested in following development of Jim’s Blog here, and suggesting others visit it too if need be. Great concept Jim.
The Norway spiral brought me here, and fully agree with the other comments. The public can greatly benefit from the expertise Jim can offer. Many aspects of rocket science are incorrectly represented in popular media which can cause confusion as to their interpretations. I am a great example of this.
ReplyDeleteIt's time to revive and update this blog!
ReplyDeleteYes, it is!!
ReplyDelete